There has been much talk about the HECS debt burden placed on students and how much it impacts on their lives. However, Australia suffers another problem with many of our best graduates being drawn overseas to pursue careers because of better remuneration.
An alternative which might help to address both of these problems would be to maintain HECS fees in trust for a period of say ten years after graduation. After that time, if the graduate has residence and a job within Australia, the HECS monies plus interest are rolled into the graduate's superannuation fund.
If however the graduate is employed outside Australia by a foreign company, their initial HECS fee is retained by the government for the benefit of Australia.
The incentive of a potential boost to future superannuation benefits and the disincentive of losing this money if employment is pursued overseas might help to encourage more students into university courses and slow the brain-drain from Australia.
Comments
Interesting concept
Robert, this is an interesting concept, the problem is cost - i dare say if we were to do some economic modelling, the cost of the program would outweigh the potential benefit. That said, I don't beleive we have a brain drain problem anymore. Indeed with a downturn underway in the UK a number of Australian professionals are returning home. Some attracted by the booming economy in the West while others are returning because of lifestyle - the challenge for the future is funding education programs that are relevant to the skills required by a future economy as opposed to those skills that are fast becoming intangible.
Interesting concept however. In some ways you could revert to align with income contingent and qualification contingent loan schemes. Kind regards, Matthew Tukaki
Matthew Tukaki, Director of Government Policy & Strategy, SansGov (Sanseman Government); PO BOX 3295 Redfern Sydney NSW 2016; Mobile 0449 703 118 matthew.tukaki@sansgov.com; www.sansgov.com