Syndicate content Subscribe to the RSS feed  › 
Stuart Hill's blog

Enabling Life: the big decision

Stuart HillUntil we change our values, we will continue to make our planet less and less able to support life, including our own and those who follow us.

Underlying the multitude of decisions that face us daily, including especially those that we tend to postpone making, is the root-level question, "are you willing and ready to support life?" This comprises the life of yourself and your family, your species (across the planet, and into the future), the biosphere (all of life: biodiversity conservation), and its ecosphere (life's supportive environments: habitat conservation).

Recognising this question as being concerned with the ‘real' bottom line, for which all other ‘bottom lines' must serve, requires levels of personal empowerment, awareness, vision, and clarity of values that most of us, deep down, wish we had, but know that we don't.

Key stepping stones towards being able to answer this question are the many small meaningful expressions of personal daring in each of these areas that all of us have experienced, both in ourselves and others. By recognising these expressions as the foundations for the emergence of a genuine sustainable culture, and building on them, we can, I believe, advance to the next stage in our species' psychosocial evolution: from manipulative, fearful, patterned, distracted and compensatory cultures to ones that are enabling of life, love, spontaneity and presence.

These are core qualities that all of our institutional structures and processes (our political, economic, business, learning, health and social systems) need to be designed and managed to enable.

Ten Common ‘Mistakes' to Avoid, and ‘Needs' to Meet, when Seeking to Create a Better World

Stuart Hill

Some thoughts on Rudd's '1,000 Great Minds' initiative and what might need to happen to improve its chances of success

Because of the holistic nature of the approach being advocated, all of these areas overlap and are highly interactive and interrelated.

1. Getting the usual ‘experts' together, to then plan for a better future. This always leads to tinkering with existing (flawed) plans, and excludes those most affected by such plans.

2. Taking problem-solving (back-end, reactive/responsive, curative) approaches. These tend to focus on symptom management and neglect the need to address the underlying maldesign and mismanagement roots of the problems. They typically over-focus on measuring problems (a prime strategy for postponing action - by those who benefit from the status quo), and on efficiency and substitution strategies (eg, improved application of pesticide and on finding less disruptive [but still purchased] substitutes, such as biological controls and genetically modified organisms - same story in other areas, such as medicine and energy).