|
|
Wed, 12/11/2008 - 12:37 — Andrew Gaines
NSW stands at a crossroads, the magnitude of which has seen greater civilizations destroy themselves.
There is an unrecognised sustainability dilemma at work in NSW. Our local issue, which is very real, is iconic of the global dilemma as expressed in the recent New Scientist cover story Growth Is Folly. It is well known that historically, societies destroy themselves by undermining their own resource bases. When farms and forests turn into deserts, then that's that. Jared Diamond's Collapse gives many examples. Anthropologist Joseph Tainter takes a slightly different angle. Tainter points out that societies collapse when they can no longer produce the energy (grain, fuel, and in today's world money) required to maintain the complex layers of education, arms manufacture, roads, ports, and administrative bureaucracy that were developed to solve the society's challenging problems (The Collapse of Complex Societies, 1988).
Wed, 08/10/2008 - 10:12 — Sean.Rooney
Building on its research experience in supporting community scale sustainable development, CSIRO brings together business, governments, NGOs and communities in a partnership initiative to focus on creating a more sustainable Australia.
Australian communities are facing an unprecedented suite of sustainability challenges. CSIRO recognises these challenges are complex and multi-dimensional in both origins and solutions. No one sector - private, public or community - has the all answers or the ability to respond to these challenges in isolation. Effective solutions lie in integrating skills, knowledge, resources and passion from across the sectors. To address this challenge CSIRO has created the Sustainable Communities Initiative (SCI). The SCI is an innovative program that brings together organisations from across the public, private, NGO, and research sectors, to work in partnership with communities, to develop and deliver solutions to local sustainability challenges and opportunities. The SCI operates as an 'action learning' program over a three year period from 2006 to 2009, undertaking partnership projects in a number of Australian communities in order learn and experience how to better work together to address local sustainability issues.
Tue, 08/07/2008 - 10:48 — andrewgaines
Our answer to this question will shape many other considerations.
Australia has strong ties with the global economy. At the moment neither Australia nor the global economy are ecologically sustainable. Global warming is a key indicator; there are others. To a significant extent economic increase drives environmental deterioration - at least in the affluent parts of the world. This is because economic increase is based on increasing the production and consumption of material goods, which currently involves increasing CO2 emissions and industrial toxins. Thus it would appear that in our present industrial civilisation economic increase and environmental sustainability are incompatible. This might be called The Great Contradiction. Below I will show some graphs from Prof Will Steffen (ANU) showing the correlation between economic increase, population growth and increase in global economic activity...
Mon, 13/10/2008 - 14:46 — Andrew Aschner
The last 50 years have taught us that the introduction of new approaches can only be accelerated if supported from the top and treated by captains of industry as strategic, so that projects with sufficient resources and priority are put in place.
I have been developing Industrial Environmental Management as a part of Sustainable Development. One of the most relevant concepts to this field is Cleaner Production, even more so than Industrial Ecology, introduced by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) in 1989. It is the continuous application of an integrated preventive environmental strategy applied to processes, products and services to reduce risks for humans and the environment. It applies to: - production processes: conserving raw materials and energy eliminating toxic raw materials and reducing the quantity and toxicity of all emissions and wastes - products: reducing negative impacts along the life cycle of a product from raw materials extraction to its ultimate disposal - services: incorporating environmental concerns into designing and delivering services My research suggests environmental problems may be traced to modern science and applied technology; clearly the effects of manufacturing processes and manufactured products on eco-systems are hugely significant. In future there will be significant new technologies invented which will lead to improvements in Environmental Management in industry, however, in working with major manufacturers I found there are already a sufficient number of concepts, systems and technologies which are capable of being rapidly deployed in an economic manner. Sustainability and Cleaner Production will continue to evolve and gain strategic importance with operations management, engineers and environmental specialists. The last 50 years have taught us, however, that the introduction of new approaches can only be accelerated if supported from the top and treated by captains of industry as strategic so that projects with sufficient resources and priority are put in place. Major improvements can be achieved provided the will exists.
Tue, 16/09/2008 - 12:43 — Danielle Uskovic
A voluntary group of IT companies have launched a free computer take-back program to help people dispose of unwanted computer equipment responsibly.
When it comes to responding to climate change there's only one way to go about it: with passion! The challenge is that we'll need to change just about every aspect of the way we do business, and while the changes aren't necessarily difficult, they take a bit of getting used to. And that's where the passion comes into it. For a company like Lenovo, whose business is making and shipping computer hardware all over the world, it's important for us to embrace the changes at every level. The challenge is we need to adopt green practices internally, in terms of our staff and business practices, externally in terms of our role as a supplier of technology to the broader community, and more broadly in terms of our participation with environment and industry level groups and organisations. It involves everything from a shift from plastic to ceramic cups in the kitchen, to participation in social initiatives like Earth Hour, through participation in fundamentally important industry initiatives like ByteBack. Organised along with a number of other leading IT companies, the ByteBack initiative is at this stage a voluntary group of IT companies looking to ensure that their assets are re-used and recycled where possible, so as not to end up in landfill. In Victoria the program has already resulted in a number of drop-off depots where small businesses and individuals can bring their once-loved hardware, and dispose of it in an environmentally responsible way. It's a great way for IT companies to take responsibility for the waste they create, however, at this stage the program is entirely voluntary, and while participating companies are taking an active interest in the whole lifecycle of their products, there remain dozens of companies who are simply not getting involved.
Mon, 08/09/2008 - 12:48 — Stuart Hill
Until we change our values, we will continue to make our planet less and less able to support life, including our own and those who follow us.
Underlying the multitude of decisions that face us daily, including especially those that we tend to postpone making, is the root-level question, "are you willing and ready to support life?" This comprises the life of yourself and your family, your species (across the planet, and into the future), the biosphere (all of life: biodiversity conservation), and its ecosphere (life's supportive environments: habitat conservation). Recognising this question as being concerned with the ‘real' bottom line, for which all other ‘bottom lines' must serve, requires levels of personal empowerment, awareness, vision, and clarity of values that most of us, deep down, wish we had, but know that we don't. Key stepping stones towards being able to answer this question are the many small meaningful expressions of personal daring in each of these areas that all of us have experienced, both in ourselves and others. By recognising these expressions as the foundations for the emergence of a genuine sustainable culture, and building on them, we can, I believe, advance to the next stage in our species' psychosocial evolution: from manipulative, fearful, patterned, distracted and compensatory cultures to ones that are enabling of life, love, spontaneity and presence. These are core qualities that all of our institutional structures and processes (our political, economic, business, learning, health and social systems) need to be designed and managed to enable.
|
|