Syndicate content Subscribe to the RSS feed  › 
Public sector efficiency

Web 2.0 & rating the Police. A Bruce Schneier perspective

Malcolm Crompton's picture

The transparency debate is nuanced & needs a lot more work.

Applying transparency and ratings to policing raises some fascinating questions that have been around for a long time. In one sense, the case recently put at "Transparency in policing?...or invasion of privacy...risk?" is that a very important group in our society should have applied to it the same logic as it wants applied to the rest of us:  'If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear'.  The reaction, though, is interesting.  Like many professions (legal, accounting, medical etc), arguments come back along the lines of 'we are different & deserve special treatment" - legal professional privilege; doctor-patient relationship etc.

Google recently used the transparency argument in "Using log data to help keep you safe", at Google Public Policy Blog, posted 13 Mar 2008.

David Brin explored the extreme of this logic some years ago in his book "The Transparent Society". For a fascinating review of this book and the "communitarian" counterpoint, see "Privacy please", a book review in Salon magazine, 26 April 1999.

Losses of personal information, trust and privacy: This is going to change your life

Malcolm Crompton's picture

We are watching a very rapid change in community attitudes on privacy.  One of the strongest contributors is the repeated and significant loss of control of personal information by private and public sector organisations around the world.  Nearly as many records of personal information about folk in the US have been lost as there are citizens.  In the UK this month, in one hit, they got up to a 50 % ratio.  Where does Australia stand?

Customers and citizens are beginning to worry.  And take action.

CxOs in the wise agency or organisation would be reviewing their security policies and their privacy plans.  Most particularly, they might like to consider a disaster plan that is rarely reviewed - their Customer Continuity Plan.  In this day and age, any self respecting organisation is likely to have a "Business Continuity Plan" to manage disaster.  What does its equivalent "Customer (or Citizen) Continuity Plan" look like?  Does it even have one?  Or is the customer expected to carry all the risk unassisted?

Privacy and Citizen-centric service delivery: Can it co-exist?

Alan BennettOften just the spectre of privacy is enough to create enough political uncertainty to derail legitimate and necessary reform activities.

Australia stands ready to seize the full opportunities of ICT. For business this is to open up productivity and customer service improvements, efficiency gains and innovation that technology can offer.

For Government - ICT is a key tool in reducing red tape and improving the relationship with its citizens.

As this forum is about Australia being a regulatory pace-setter - I believe in the pursuit of services delivered with the end user in mind or ‘citizen-centric service delivery', we have to move past the current boundaries and structures of government.

We need to actively investigate the real and perceived regulatory issues that stand in the way of us reaching this goal.

I'd like to touch on one potential regulatory impediment - privacy.

Now, in my experience, while privacy is a legitimate concern, it is often a concern that takes on a life of its own - leading to a debate that rapidly loses touch with reality.

When technology is involved in the debate, I'm often amazed at some of the doomsday scenarios regarding potential invasions of privacy.

The Australian Law Reform Commission released a report on reforms to the Privacy Act last month that included a number of recommendations aimed at making the legal framework more responsive to technological change.

Gershon Review 2004: Releasing Resources for the Frontline (Independent Review of Public Sector Efficiency in the UK)

A former Chief Executive of the UK Treasury’s Office of Government Commerce, Sir Peter Gershon has undertaken several major strategic reviews for the UK Government on procurement including ICT a

Open Forum Survey: Australian ICT Review 2008

This survey will be analysed to produce an Open Forum submission to the Australian Government's ICT Review.

Independent Review of the Australian Government's use of ICT

The Austraian Government has engaged UK Efficiency Expert Sir Peter Gershon to lead an independent review of the Australian Government's use and management of information and communication technology (ICT). The review is part of the broader ongoing reform agenda to improve the efficiency of government spending and deliver better value for money.  It will provide a snapshot of the current state of ICT in the Australian Government, what exists and how it is managed to deliver Government objectives.

To raise awareness about the project and solicit public views on the ICT Review's Terms of Reference, this Open Forum discussion page will be open for comments until 30 May 2008.