The debate has been long on rhetoric and short on cold, hard analysis. But it may be about to improve.
Ever since 11 September 2001, governments, national security & law enforcement around the world has been arguing vigorously for hugely increased collection of information about citizens from disconnected sources and applying data mining to it.
The ensuing debate has been long on rhetoric and short on cold, hard analysis.
Now we are seeing some deeper, balanced analysis coming through with the release of a report by the US National Academy of Sciences titled Protecting individual privacy in the struggle against terrorists.
The report rather bluntly states that explosive increases in data mining have been a waste of time and resources. Hopefully it marks the beginning of the end of a rather frightening era of this form of data surveillance by government.
There is plenty of strong position taking on both sides of this debate still to come. We don't need much more of that. We do need more of the kind of analysis that the NAS report has given us.