› 
Capturing Green Innovation

Gerard FlorianOne of the areas of focus for my role at Dimension Data is Green IT, and in that capacity I have attended or spoken at a number of ICT and climate change conferences over the past 12 months. At these events I've found that there is always at least one amazing green concept or innovation presented - but once the conference is over, what happens to those ideas?

Last month, I participated in a media roundtable together with other industry representatives. One of the speakers was John Maunder, CIO at the South Australian Department of Transport, Energy & Infrastructure who presented a range of lateral ideas on ways in which his department's ICT infrastructure can contribute to reducing our impact on the environment. John spoke about the idea of enabling Wi-Fi access on public transport to make it a more attractive option to commuters and thereby increase utilisation. He also explained how traffic flow systems can be applied intelligently to ensure that peak hour traffic is kept moving, reducing the time that vehicles spend on the road emitting carbon.

However, the most compelling concept John put forward was to propose that we get serious about "hot rock" technology - geothermal energy. He also suggested that we should locate data centres - one of the most significant energy consumers in ICT - at the source of these geothermal energy plants, such as in Central Australia, and transfer data from these centres to our major business centres over fibre optic cable. Why do this? Because transmitting electricity over long distances involves significant energy loss (up to 70 percent in some instances).

Now, we have just had news of Google investing in geothermal technology in the United States. No great surprise, given the scale of their data centres, with an estimated 450,000 servers across 25 countries. A day later, our Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson announces $A50 million funding for a national geothermal drilling program. As these drilling programs are likely to be in pretty remote locations in Australia (given the map on Earth2Tech) we should already be thinking about applying ideas like those put forward by John Maunder.

We are starting to do a good job of capturing and sharing ideas on what we can do personally to reduce our impact on the environment. For instance, at Dimension Data, our people have access to a personal carbon calculator - Zerofootprint  - which gives them the ability to not only estimate their carbon footprint but also provides information and assistance in taking steps to reduce it. Things like eating more organic food and less meat, car pooling, installing energy-efficient lighting and composting kitchen waste.

However, at a corporate and government level, we are not doing nearly enough to capture and share ideas in the same way. There are potentially hundreds, if not thousands of ways in which we can either reduce ICT's consumption of energy or apply ICT laterally to reduce our individual or collective carbon emission levels. We just don't have the mechanism to capture this innovation, quantify its environmental benefit and share it with corporate Australia.

As Zerofootprint states on its website: "our individual actions, whether large or small, have a collective impact that will ultimately determine our future".

When it comes to climate change, collective action is what it's all about - and it doesn't matter whether you are an individual or an organisation.

How are you sharing your ideas on Green IT with Australian business and government? I'd welcome your thoughts, either by contacting me directly (gerard.florian@didata.com.au), or by posting a comment to this article.

Gerard Florian was appointed Dimension Data's Australian CTO in 2001. Gerard works closely with both local and global Dimension Data management to define the overall direction and strategy of the business, focusing on technologies, solutions and services. He is also responsible for marketing that strategy and Dimension Data's value proposition to staff, clients and partners. His work with vendors encompasses creating and improving their long-term plans and partnerships with Dimension Data. Gerard has been in the IT industry for over 20 years and joined Dimension Data in 1992, holding various technical positions involving pre-sales and consulting responsibilities. Prior to Dimension Data, he was Consultant and Network Engineer for several network integration companies, as well as undertaking various network consulting projects.

Comments

A combination of factors

Gerard makes some interesting points. Although I'm not sure that the problem is a lack of ideas, I think it's rather a lack of willingness to implement them.

Geothermal is indeed a very interesting idea, and there are a number of projects under way aroung the world seeking to make this approach to energy production more efficient, espeically in terms of water use.

However, the solution we need is't just about geothermal, nuclear solar, wind, bikes, powers and power usage managment. It's not about any one of these factors - it's about all of them combined. Not only do we need to make a signifcant dent in the growth of out power consumption and therefore reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, we actually have to significantly reduce our emissions, and look for technologies which willincrease the uptake of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

As such we need to look at a comibination off approaches, solar power should be mandatory in all new houses - this would not only reduce the impact these haouses have on the environment the increase in demand would also position Australia at the forfront of solar cell production. Car usage should be significantly restricted, coupled with a greater invesment in public transport. There should be a moratorium on the construction of new coal-power plants, and support for a range of alternative energy sources, wind wave and geothermal.

In a decade these sorts of changes will all be in place, even though they may irk some at the moment, we will simply have to adopt a different approach to power generation, which make s use aof a variety of compolimentary sources, rather than rely solely on the traditional coal-fired power plant approach.

JV Douglas -

technology writer by trade, luddite by conviction

Easier for cars

Much as I applaud most of the above, I note that making life easier for drivers (less time in traffic - like more freeways) encourages drivers to drive more. How do we balance these contradictions? Interested in your views.
Ronald Forbes
Mega Planner from way back

Lateral thinking

I think the challenge when it comes to cars on the road is not so much about encouraging or discouraging car use; it's more about trying to minimise their impact. It's a much more subtle approach to apply technology to the problem than simply building more highways. Also, with the cost of building public transport infrastructure so expensive (just look at the challenges the NSW Government is up against trying to build new rail corridors in Sydney), we do need to look at ways in which we can optimise existing infrastructure and transport. The good thing about John Maunder's ideas are that they are a lateral approach to the problem, and also likely to cost a fraction of a major infrastructure project.

Martin Aungle
Corporate Communications Manager
Dimension Data
Tel: +61 (0) 2 8249 5502
Mob: +61 (0) 419 239 838
Fax: +61 (0) 2 8249 5369
e-mail: martin.aungle@didata.com.au