Many westerners were bewildered by Chairman Mao’s absence in the Olympic Opening Ceremony. This showed the West can not make sense of modern China. This also showed that there is still a long way to go for the Chinese and the west to fully understand each other. Liying Zhang writes.
The Little Red Notebook and the Mao Zedong's headshot on Australian newspapers were recurring images during the Beijing Olympic Games.
Not surprisingly, until arriving at the Beijing Olympic Village, many athletes and even journalists thought that their Chinese sporting rivals were still reciting The Little Red Notebook everyday before training.
The west is late in accurately decoding Chinese ideology. So the western world did not understand why the history-telling Olympic Opening Ceremony didn't mention Chairman Mao.
The omission is a natural choice in accord with Chinese thought but a leap of Communist faith according to the stereotypical western view.
When China refuses to eulogize democracy but rather insist on calling itself Communist, the west regards Chinese people as red in behavior and stubborn in mindset. Therefore, the cult of Mao, the Cultural Revolution, and the Great Leap Forward became China's images absorbed by the western world.
By this reasoning, the west has failed to explain China's agile performance in economic reforms. Unlike the western assumption, the Chinese are born sensitive to politics and economy, under whatever name, Communism or Capitalism.
The ability to be flexible is evident in the modern history of China, including Mao's rule from 1949 to 1976 and the successful economic reforms after 1978.
To the west, the cult of Mao was an inexplicable puzzle. How could the Chinese be that foolish?
China had a splendid economic and cultural history until 1840, the infamous First Opium War. However, from then to 1949 when Mao received his mandate, China was continuously invaded by foreigners. There was a ubiquitous feeling that the Chinese nation was subjugated, repeatedly, by everyone in an entire century.
Not because of Mao's position as a prominent Communist but his uncompromising stand in kicking out all the foreigners, Mao was respected as the symbol of dignity of the Chinese nation.
But there was a problem. The blind worship of Mao brought series and disastrous consequences during the 1950s up to 1970s. The door for communicating with the rest of the world was shut down.
Inside China, people were brainwashed in a twisted way, repeatedly hearing that people in the western countries were living in capitalists' naked exploitation. And Mao was constructed as the savior.
It is imaginable that if repeating a statement often enough, eventually people believe it especially in a lack of any other information source.
As soon as Mao died, Chinese people began questioning his legacy.
When Deng Xiaoping came to power in 1978, he just put a quick end to any discussion by declaring that Mao's legacy was 70% positive and 30% negative. Shortly, the whole nation focused on the economy. Deng Xiaoping said: "To get rich is glorious." And "It doesn't matter if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice."
But why do the Chinese refuse to accept western political democracy?
It is not an irony that China still calls itself Communist but a form of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
Political revolutions generally bring more confrontation than peace. And peace brings prosperity. This understanding of peace is the essence of Chinese culture.
Moreover, with a series of successful reforms under the name of Socialism, the non-democratic Chinese regime works far better than the US-dominated so called "democratic system".
After three decades of isolation, the Chinese suddenly realized the wide economic gap between the East and the West. On one hand, it was once a shock to the Chinese and the only reaction is to adapt as soon as possible.
On the other hand, the west has been used to ignoring the existence of China for a long time, let alone the change of thought of the Chinese.
Reasonably, when China declared its return to the world stage as a going-to-be superpower by the stunning Olympic Opening, the west was not that surprised as the Chinese commodity has already been part of daily life.
To a certain extent, the west is scornful of digging the complex Chinese philosophy. Besides criticizing the garbage in Chinatowns around the world, what many westerners interest is the cheap stuff "MADE IN CHINA".
The west's mindset was set by the western media catering for the west's comfort, seeing China's booming as a threat.
By this preset tone, the western media are used to portraying the Chinese Communist Party as a shadowy organization that controls everything and oppresses opponents, and the Tibetans, for example, as pitiful victims.
The Chinese are eager to be understood. But there is still a long way to go for the Chinese and the west to fully understand each other.
Comments
Nice story
You are well presenting your point of views,
very impressive & nice story
Interesting
I think you make some very valid points, Liying. The greatest problem for China regarding its international reputation is, as you mentioned, a problem with the source. Although China has become far more adept and energized about presenting an image, and involving itself in a dialogue with the West in the past decade, I think that a lot of people in the West assume the message is propaganda without truth, and thus have a tendency to switch off, no matter how nuanced. A lot of this, perhaps, is also due to a position of superiority and dominance that both poles tend to adopt when considering the other side.
Thanks, Bianca
I agree with you that to a certain extent chinese government controls the domestic media strictly. But to the western media, the Sydney Morning Herald for example, if I listed all its coverage about China in the past 6 months, most of them are negative: baby miik scandal, earthquake, tibet riot, human rights, bus bomb, corruption scandal, internet censorship, air pollution.....i could hardly find a little piece of postive news or commentary. Then how could the Australian readers shape a comprehensive and truely understanding viewpoint about China in this tone of media reporting?
good discription about the culture between china and the west
Liying is really understand the situation and the history of china and chinese, plus she is understand what is the Western people think about the country and his citizens, big change in china after Deng XiaoPing open the door to outside world and started the growth from Guangdong, shanghai and other cities in the east side of china and later move into the central, and west.
Communist has change and look at their economic and monetary for china, they started the stock market,commodity, property, production line transfer from other country into china, etc..., communicst keep sending the staff to oversea university to study............people mentality has changes, they want to live as comfort as western people, they want to have the best things in the world, and now they can demand for it.
the article show that Liying has good experience and understand the power of media. hope that you can help chinese and china to let more western people understand the present china................. cheer ......
Succint summary of China's contemporary history
Thanks, Liying, for expressing the common view of how mainland Chinese view themselves.
:)
As media, our role is to educate the public.
To do so, we must first continually educate ourselves, especially up and coming super-economies.
no conmunication, no understanding
no conmunication, no understanding