None of us want to have our front wall or our garage door defaced by graffiti. But what can we do about it when it happens?
It seems to me that our government policies are failing us in regard to deterring this disgraceful behaviour.
When I see yet another example of the defacing of public or private property I have to question whether this conduct is the highest form of arrogance and self-delusion? Why do these vandals believe that anyone really cares about seeing their scribblings, their scrawlings, their defacing of someone else's property?
One has to ask, if these vandals are really seeking public recognition, then why are they too ashamed to clearly identify who they are? If they are really seeking to be identified, why not stand up and admit to the authorship of their creations? Why hide away like cowards in the night?
A number of local councils have shown that they are prepared to give a public forum for honest and talented urban artists. This is commendable and should be encouraged.
I do not complain about young and talented artists who seek to legitimately display their creations. It is the would-be-if-they-could-be's who are the cause of this problem.
And despite numerous law and order programs graffiti continues on its dark and dirty path.
A recent media release from the NSW Police Department reported that on Saturday, 30 August 2008 police arrested two teenagers in relation to a graffiti attack on a train at Cronulla railway station. Four teenage males were observed spraying a large amount of graffiti on the train.
The graffiti was estimated to have caused over $5000 in damage.
Commuter crime and general duties officers from Miranda attended immediately and gave chase, arresting a 16-year-old Cronulla youth a short time later.
Apparently he was expected to undergo youth conferencing in relation to the incident. Youth conference you might ask? Why was he not looking at jail time??
The issue of graffiti vandalism was raised in the NSW Parliament by the Shadow Attorney-General Greg Smith on 20.6.08. At that time, the Shadow Attorney- General drew the attention of the House to the dreadful epidemic of vandalism that plagues his local area of Epping and many other areas throughout the State.
He pointed out that graffiti is a great scourge on our community and it has been estimated to cost the State of New South Wales more than $100 million a year. He congratulated one of his local papers, the Weekly Times, for starting a campaign on graffiti vandalism. The Weekly Times was offering up to $5,000 to local residents who dob in a vandal.
What did the Iemma Government say to this commendable statement? They played politics.
Well I suggest it is about time we put politics aside and did something about this epidemic.
On 9 May 2006, the NSW Attorney General announced the Government's ‘comprehensive strategy' to reduce the incidence of graffiti vandalism on trains, public transport infrastructure and other community facilities. A major component of this strategy was the establishment of the Anti-Graffiti Action Team.
Despite setting up this Team, nothing seems to have changed.
It all seems to be smoke and mirrors, good intentions but with little practical effect.
A look at the website shows the comprehensive strategy in its full glory placing a major onus on victims and property owners to prevent graffiti! It shows victims how to clean off the graffiti after it has trashed their property. It suggests witnesses contact crime stoppers.
It also tells us to ‘prevent graffiti vandalism by: removing it promptly, maintaining your property, installing fencing so that it won't attract graffiti, painting walls and fences with dark colours, planting vegetation in front of the walls and fences, employing security measures and improving lighting!
It seems to me that it is time we admitted that the problem is more serious than the government is prepared to admit and it won't go away unless we are prepared to get tough on the perpetrators of this destructive and shadowy crime.
Cronulla MP Malcolm Kerr (Liberal) practised as a barrister before being elected to NSW Parliament in 1984. His Parliamentary service has included Government Whip, Opposition Whip, Secretary to Shadow Cabinet, Chairman on the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC). Currently Malcolm is a member of the Committee on the Office of the Ombudsman and Police Integrity Commission and the ICAC committee.
www.malcolmkerr.com.au
Comments
Graffiti scourge!
The time has come for teenager's to develop an affinity with the neighbourhood in which they reside in. By forming a compulsory community service group specifically aimed at young people, it would help them develop a pride for their surrounding's it could solve most of the current graffiti and anti-social problem's being experienced Australia-wide.
Each suburb could have it's own group and encompass a program that would make young people develop a self-worthiness that they distinctly seem to be lacking in this day and age.
graffiti, advertising and public art
This is an interesting challenge, and as such I'd suggest a range of responses is necessary. Graffiti is not only a problem for those who are left to clean it up - it is also terribly detrimental to those who engage in the activity. When I was growing I knew some kids who got involved in graffiti. These boys should have had no reason to be anti-social, they all came from upper middle class families, they were all being given a very expensive education a St Patricks in Sydney yet - as the last commentator mentioned - they were not engaging with, or valuing their local community.
The result was mess on the walls, for sure, but for the boys and their families it was far worse, as their invovlement with graffiti lead to an involvement with drug, which lead to an involvement in petti crime, assult and robbery, assult with a weapon, jail and a serious drug dependancy. For their families it was a tragedy which continues through to the present day.
Like the last commentator I think the key lies in engaging kids with their local community, but I think the more creative we are about this involvment the better. You can't just force kids to do this or do that - clean up here, plant a tree there - the sorts of kids who do graffiti will find a way out of it, and on to the streets again.
I think we should look at a more creative response to a very serious problem.
Why do we tolerate so much paid advertising on the walls of our community, but not encourage more opportunities for artistic expression. I find much outdoor adversting just as ugly and just as noisey as graffiti, and would like to see much of it replaced with murals.
Kids with an artistic bent will value their community far more if they are involved in makeing it a more beautiful place to be - and won't deface it because by participating in community projects they develop a sense of ownership and pride.
Why not replace outdoor advertising with corporate sponsored community murals? The businesess could have their advertising, the kids could have a chance to express themselves in a healthier enviroment, and the community generally could benefit from a more beautiful and colourful environment.
JV Douglas -
technology writer by trade, luddite by conviction
Thank you!
Have you ever talked to a
Have you ever talked to a teenager who does such a "graffiti crime"? What do you think he would say? How would he rationalize his behaviour? No answers, I think.
Why do they do that??? I totally agree with Mr Kerr's standpoint - it is impossible that these kids want to become famous, they can't be famous because they are concidered to be criminals. I think their behaviour is the most visible sign of their aggression against society. "If it is not allowed, then people are against us", a young artist thinks making spray-painted squiggle on the wall...It seems reasonable to show kids that our society needs them, that they are not neglected or ignored. I would say, we even should get more interested in those things that the young find attractive. So why not make graffiti legal in particular places?
Spesial area for art...
Graffity is not a vandalism...
First of all, people should understand, what graffity is and why it exists. I won't be surpriesed if many of you say that graffity is a vandalism. But let me disagree. Graffity making and vandalism differ radically. Vandalism is a kind of destructure, but graffity making is a kind of creation. It creates special pictures with a specific maening. Graffity is a sort of urban culture, it can be even called "urban art". It reflects the situations in the society, it can be a way of individual self-expression or protest against policy. To stop graffity means to solve the problems that cause it.
P.S. Banning graffity can't solve the problem of "spoiling private property". Remember that graffity making can be a kind of protest and the more one tries to prohibit it, the more active the protest becomes.
The problem is not in teenagers and graffiti
I think that the problem is not in teenagers and graffiti. Juvenile crime is a sign that there is something wrong with society. Young criminals aren't inherently bad, they are reacting to the conditions in which they find themselves. Many psychologists spotlight the breakdown of family life as a prime cause of crime. A lot of young offenders are products of unhappy families. In my opinion, if we want to solve the problem of graffiti we should decrease crime rates in general.
Graffiti itself is a form of art. But it doesn't get due recognition. Theres a big difference between disgusting graffiti we can see on our property and graffiti which can brighten up grey walls. Though some people regard graffiti as a form of vandalism and a menace I'm sure that graffiti is as valid as any other art form.
Graffiti: is it good or bad?
In my opinion graffiti is a form of art. Yes, teenagers who do graffiti has their own seeing of our world. And they create their seeing on the walls, garage doors etc. But the government can`t prevent it. And the main reason, I think, is a generation gap. For most of adults life is work and work is the way of life. They think that graffiti is just a kind of kid`s entertainment. As for me, graffiti is a way of life for teenagers. It`s their way of self-expression.
How can we solve the problem of graffiti? We must speak with teenagers, we must see what the want to tell us with the help of graffiti.
But WE CAN`T SOLVE THE PROBLEM WITH THE HELP OF FORCE. Every human-being has the right for self-expression.
Why does everydody think
Why does everydody think that teenagers painting graffiti seek public recognition? The main aim of graffiti is not to show who the athor is but to express your point of view, to show aggression towards today's cociety. Young men painting graffiti have never thought of recognition, the painting is the most valuable thing for them. This is how they express themselves. They do it for other people, not for themselves.
This is a stereotype that many of graffiti painters are drug addicts or criminals. Most of my friends who make graffiti are nor addicts neither criminals. They are just young men with their own life position. Many of them are creative personalities, so graffiti is a whole life for them.
So what can be possible solution for the problem? maybe it's better not to create commitees or to develop strategies but just to biuld a huge wall for painters could express themselves whenever they want and however they want without hiding their faces from the police?
That was very interesting to
Is "Tagging" Art ?
I've seen some amazing grafitti murals that I would absolutely consider art. However they are quite rare, unlike the lame grafitti tags that I see everywhere which I absolutely consider vandalism. I'm wondering if there is a distinction drawn between these two styles of grafitti amongst those in the scene?
Sally Rose
And what 'bout you?
Well... I consider it to be erroneous to enforce people to do something without showing HOW it should be done by your own example! Mr. Kerr, c'mon, arrange a huge graffiti festival, invite painters all over the world, tell everyone about the damage that has been made, and try your own hand at drawing graffiti))) You will be closer to people, you know, in this way, and they will respect you for the lack of verbosity and for the presence of real work! Thank you))))
What are you talking about!?!?
I may mistaken but I don't see any problem at all! Why do you dramatise the situation about graffity so much??
The author equals graffity and drugs, crimes and social ill-being! I can't believe my eyes!..To my mind, graffity is just another form of self-expression, it's a kind of art, NOT CRIME or even protest.
Young creative persons paint walls in a cool way in order to do them bright and pleasant to see. I don't understand people who are against graffity at all! Have they ever seen our old and senile buildings?!?!? They are so ugly that they only spoil the beauty of the whole city. And painters choose these objects to make them look like a picture! There are a lot of real masters among the graffitists and their works does't look like scribblings or scrawlings.
In conclusion I wanna say that I've seen a lot of graffities and I don't mind somebody making them. Just the opposite! I believe, the young painters can do more than some politics or administration for the face of our city.
In my opinion it was very