› 
Pakistan, Taliban, Politics and the US

Reuben BrandA very fragile political scenario emerged this week as the 13th President of Pakistan was sworn into office. A flailing congressional system now hangs in the balance amid tight speculation from opposition parties. Writes Reuben Brand.

With the resignation of US backed military dictator Pervez Musharraf and the installation of US approved Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistan has become a political playground as pressure mounts to curb insurgencies in the war on terror.

The last time I was in Pakistan I stayed in Peshawar, the largest city in the North West Frontier Provence and closest to the Afghan border, where anti US sentiment was running thick on the ground. So another government with close ties to the US will have an increasingly hard time in power, as tensions around the border rise.

Asif Ali Zardari, widower of the assassinated Benazir Bhutto and co-chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), was sworn in this week as the new President of Pakistan.

Protest from the opposition is mounting over the failed coalition between Nawaz Sharif, leader of Pakistan Muslim League and the PPP just one week after Musharraf's resignation. The partnership became problematic as both sides vied for the presidency but none could come to an agreement regarding the re-instating of judges who were deposed under the Musharraf regime.

The rise of the PPP, like a phoenix from the ashes of the Bhutto dynasty comes as Pakistan, a dictatorship prone country, struggles to re-establish its democratic process within a fledgling government.

But now, as a nation rid of Musharraf, Pakistanis have the chance to forward a democratic process and bring about a great deal of change. Politically, Pakistan's future could well be at a turning point.

Zardari's previous political career has been one of constant scandal and intrigue. During his wife Benazir Bhutto's second term as Prime Minister, Zardari acquired the nickname "Mr ten percent" as he had a keen interest in the Financial Ministry. Subsequently amid various corruption allegations, Bhutto decided to place him in the non-revenue generating sector.

Many in Pakistan are sceptical of Zardiri's credentials as President. His resume sports a long history of time spent in jail on numerous charges, ranging from corruption to murder. Charges that Zardari said were all politically motivated.

Like his predecessor, Zardari is also seen as being too close an ally to the US. To avoid the risk of being rejected in the next parliamentary elections or an uprising from tribal leaders in the frontier provinces, Zardari, as an elected civilian leader, now has a very delicate path to tread.

Sworn in on Tuesday with a green light from the US, Zardari has reinstated the PPP back into the ruling majority of Pakistan's political arena. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice issued a statement confirming support for the new government.

"We will continue to work with the Pakistani government and political leaders and urge them to redouble their focus on Pakistan's future and its most urgent needs, including stemming the growth of extremism," she said.

"Stemming the growth of extremism," an interesting notion considering the US led war on terror has terrorised the Middle East and its neighbours since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. Now with the escalating violence in the region the US are intently, egregiously and continuously looking across the border to the Taliban strongholds in Pakistan's Frontier Provinces.

The US air strike on September 8 that killed up to 20 people, innocent woman and children included, came as reports that President Bush had secretly approved a ground campaign to be carried out by US Special Forces inside the Pakistani border without Pakistan's permission. A move that has led Pakistan's military chief, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, to criticize and condemn the US for the attacks, saying that his country's sovereignty will be defended "at all cost."

The key factor for the ongoing aggression by the US is that Pakistan is the only Muslim country to possess nuclear capabilities. So as far as the US is concerned, their involvement in the Pakistani government as well as their increased number of troops in the region is paramount if they are too successfully puppeteer a sub-continental pantomime.

This would amount to a very difficult feat considering some of Pakistan's lawless frontier provinces are among the most dangerous regions in the world and according the US's war on terror harbour some of Al-Qaeda's key players. Even Osama himself supposedly calls it home.

Yes, Pakistan possess  nuclear arms, but so does India, China, Israel, North Korea, Russia, France the UK and of course the USA. The latter being the only country to use them. So why are countries like Pakistan and Iran frowned upon by the international community when they join, or want to join the ‘nuclear club'? If it is an issue of safety, then the US should immediately undergo nuclear disarmament; for as history will tell us their rhetoric and actions are far more aggressive and dangerous.

Pakistan is of increasing geopolitical importance in the US's war on terror. The US are increasing the number of troops in the region and are mounting more incursions into Pakistan, bringing with it a higher number of innocent civilian casualties.

The fragility of Pakistan's current political landscape is palpable, but as a country post Musharraf there is a good chance for real democratic change. The reinstatement of a democratically elected government gives the majority of Pakistanis hope that previous dictatorial regimes will remain a thing of the past.

Reuben Brand is a freelance journalist working in Sydney. After completing his undergrad in Fine Art at the National Art School, he is now in the final stages of his Master of Media Practice. With a keen interest in documentary film making and global politics, who knows what the years ahead will bring.

Comments

Pakistani politics

Great comments Reuben, and talking as an ex-pat living in Pakistan, I cant agree more on the fragility of the political situation.

I think the general view from Australia and other western countries has painted all of Pakistan as gun-toting, Taliban-loving, would-be suicide bombers. However my experience is that most people here just want Pakistan to be ruled by Pakistan.

General Musharraf, if nothing else, built an unprecedented level of public hatred against him that has focused the country on one single goal of never letting ourselves be ruled by the US like that again.

Now we have General Kayyani at the head of the military who is a staunch supporter of Pakistan ruling Pakistan, and for once the public and military is united in sending a clear message to the US that if they do strikes from Pakistan against Pakistanis, that we will defend ourselves. "About time!" we all breathe. The Pakistani military is actively working in the Northern Areas to flush out radicals and daily we hear reports of 30 or 40 killed in their actions. So WHY DO WE NEED THE U.S TO OPERATE FROM WITHIN OUR COUNTRY TOO? Stay in Afghanistan and work on that side of the border, but keep out of our business...

If they can manage that, Pakistan's politial situation will become a whole lot less fragile, mark my words!

An excellent article. 

An excellent article. Honestly I do not know enough about the intricacies of the situation to comment much, except to say that the US over-interest in Pakistan feels to be quite against UN conventions... There is no positive reason that the US should have so much involvement, it all seems quite self-serving. They say it's the preservation of democracy, but who are they to say that their system of government is the one that all other countries should adopt. I feel that in Pakistan; US involvement is merely spawning anti-US sentiment, making the unrest in the country more strongly and more frequently felt. Perhaps if the US let Pakistan run itself unrest would ease, and the threat of violence would quiet?

Great Article

It will be interesting to see how the Special Operations situation pans out with the new government.

Well Done Reuben

A well articulated article . I now have a much clearer idea of what's going on in that very sensitive political region.

Democracy for Dinner?

It is interesting your point about Pakistan's nuclear capabilities -- As the only Muslim nation to possess nuclear weaponry, Pakistan's alligience with the US, one would imagine, would be of at least moderate importance to the US and their bloody war on terror... So why oh why are the US now conducting operations, unsanctioned, unauthorised and certainly unwanted, on Pakistani sovereign territory? Is this a test of the new governemnts support of the US? Are they just asserting their authority? I kind of suspect that they actually don't care anymore, and that they do whatever they like, no matter who's soil its on!

But the really distressing thing about all this, is that inevitably it is the general population who suffer, and Pakistanis are copping it -- If Zardari does anything one would hope that he would turn his attention to the Pakistani people for a change. Health, education -- even just provision of basics like food, electricity and water is something in dire need of attention. But with a nickname like Mr. 10% its unfortunately not very hopeful. Yes there is a strong move towards democratic change, which is fantastic, but there needs to be more than just that -- you can't feed your family on a ballot paper.

DEMOCRACY....WHAT IS THAT?

GOOD ARTICLE ROO...ALBEIT A WEE BIT NAIVE.

DEMOCRACY DOESNT EXIST ANYWHERE IN THE TRUE SENSE OF THE WORD. THE POLITICAL PROCESS EVERYWHERE IS CORRUPT. IT ONLY FAVOURS THE RICH.

MR 10% IS ANOTHER CORRUPT POLITICAN FOOLING THE MASSES.

PEOPLE ARE MOSTLY FOLLOWERS AND ARE EASILY FOOLED.

THE WHOLE SYSTEM NEEDS TO BE CHANGED STARTING WITH THE END OF CAPITALISM.

PAKSITAN WILL EVENTUALLY BECOME LIKE IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN.

Pakistani Politics

Reuben you did an outstanding job and i want to comment on all of your points but it may not be possible for me right now but anyhow here's what i think...

No doubt that new president of Pakistan is most powerful civilian president in the country's 61 year's history but most controversial and corrupt as well...but does it really matter? No because he is democratically elected head of the state...he didnt come to the power riding on a tank like american puppet General Retarded Musharraf...if we try to find out that what new hope lies for pakistani democracy than let there be at least 5 elections and each government should be allowed to complete its 5 years term and then you'll see true democratic leaders will merge out of this lengthy process...but why should there be such democratic process in Pak because this is not in the interest of USA...American's want a dictator running Pak with an iron fist...they want one telephone number so its easy for them to dictate their terms....in democracy they'll have to create and promote their opinion among president, prime minister, opposition leaders and so on...nah they dont have time for that...but there's still hope for Pak, as people of Pak are becoming more aware and conscious about what's happening in their country and if they want they can bring a change in Pak...