› 
Looking for Love in Decoupling World

Douglascomms's picture

Sorry, the heading might have been slightly misleading, I'm not talking about the kind of person to person love that leads to coupling, weddings, mortgages, and occasionally even children. I'm talking about the coupling that leads countries to plunge, lemming like, into and out of economic crises, forming a macroeconomic conga line behind that pinnacle of consumer power the US of A. 

There's a debate currently raging as to whether the USA's economic woes will suck the rest of the world into a global recession, or whether Asian and European consumers have become sufficiently powerful to pick up where US demand is about to fall off.

If the global economy remains tightly coupled, and we're all on the verge of plummeting headlong into a global recession, I hate to break it to you, but it's our own stupid fault. 

For the last few decades open market evangelists have gone forth and multiplied, chanting the mantra that small open economies should focus on exports, constrain wages, and limit government spending on human capital development. 

It's a quick cheap fix to grow GDP, but has a disasterous effect at the microeconomic level, because constrained wages prevent local industries from finding a market, and local technologies from developing, not to mention human capital, which stagnates under neglect. 

The result on the micro-scale is that the kids in China who make your sneakers are in bare feet. At the macro level it leaves most of the world's economies at the mercy of the North American consumers, who themselves are at the mercy of a poorly regulated loans sector.

What this all means for Australia is interesting indeed. For a while we've continued to wear our rings, and pretend our relationship with the US was a strong as always, we've also been conducting a not-so-secret romance with Asia. In a desperate bid to prove our fidelity to our old ally, we even signed a free trade agreement, and pretended we remained true, while our dalliance with our Asian neighbours grew ever more serious. 

So what happens now? 

As is often the case financial hardship may well force an end to the sham relationship we have struggled so long maintain. If Asian consumers continue to strut their decoupled stuff on world markets, Australia will drop all pretences and shift it's focus from East to West, (go look at where we sit on the map and then get back to me). 

We can tell ourselves that really it's just a separation, but inside we all know the truth. If only breaking up wasn't so hard to do.

I wonder if we can still be friends? 

Comments

A wonderful blog

This is a tremendous piece of satire.

It perfectly captures the bog standard but ever fashionable leftist tropes of the chattering classes with such delicate irony one might, for one delicious moment, think the author serious in her opinions. Long may she hold the preening self richeousness, jaw dropping historical ignorance and high school economic lunacy of the idiot left up to the light in this inspired way, rendering their arguments risible merely by repeating them at face value.

Trade makes people poor! Indeed! No wonder North Korea's so rich and South Korea so poor. Chinese 'kids' eh? Let them eat grass as they pine for the madcap japes their starving grandparents enjoyed during the 'Great Leap Forward'! Bravo, and to post on a day when the Dow Jones went up by 400 points was the very cherry on the icing on the cake.

So, as capitalism collapses in flames around us, millions of middle managers starve in the streets of Paris and London and ragged advertising executives flood into East Germany to join the fraternal masses in their unstoppable march towards socialist utopia, I look forward to more tongue in cheek reports from the frontline cafes of the revolution. I nearly spat my Caffè macchiato over my dog eared old copy of 'No Logo' I was laughing so much.

Decoupling is just about a different kind of coupling

The dependence of the world economy on the US market has been the fact of life for a long time now. China and India are emerging as alternatives in this sense, but will take a while yet to get us to the level where the US is not going to be THE market driving global demand. China has been the key factor maintaining global economic growth for the past few years, and we are already well-coupled with this market, to use your analogy.

The problem with Australia is that is an economy that has been relying on exports of mainly resources, rather than on internal human capability, knowledge services, etc development, which is the key to OUR economic future. In this context, there isn't much that any coupling or decoupling can do for us. In a global economy, we are all connected with little choice but to play along. The question is how we choose to play the game. And, at the moment, we play for the present, and are not thinking much about the future. Developing our capability to face the future indeed should be our main game.