› 
Spinning Plates

Sonia AllanThe front page of www.petergarrett.com.au displays some media releases detailing the Minister's recent work. This is how it appeared this morning:

5 Sept - Minister says no to Shoalwater Bay Rail and Port
4 Sept - Minister suspends reef cove approval
3 Sept - Green Neighbourhoods a click away
29 Aug - Energy Efficiency tops agenda in Melbourne
27 Aug - Minister announces Priority Assessment List (this last one draws attention to  27 animals, plants and important habitat areas)

Below this, we have photos and news of two Australian primary schools learning about climate change and native trees.

A narrow column to the right of the page showcases some interesting links - a Green paper on Carbon Pollution Reduction, Energy Efficiency, Kingsford Smith Green Heroes, Environment Protection Legislation, Grants and Volunteer opportunities for community Greenies. Elsewhere there are info-kits and downloads on Earth Hour, Renewable Energy, Clean Coal, and more besides.

Tip top work.

But hang about - isn't Garrett the Minister for the Arts? In fact the Minister for Environment, Heritage, and the Arts as well. That's a mouthful. Lumping the massive portfolio of the Environment together with two other cultural portfolios is a painful reminder of the way Arts is often sent to the back of the queue, perhaps seen as belonging at the back of the queue. It's an extra curricular activity, a filler.

If you search for them on Garrett's website, of course there are some Media Releases concerning the arts - but they are considerably fewer and farther between, and it sends a clear message as to where the main priority lies. Shadow Minister Sharman Stone covers the areas of Environment, Heritage, Arts and Indigenous Affairs. There’s a pattern emerging here.

How anyone could reasonably be expected to manage these multiple portfolios effectively, to give a reasonable amount of time and attention to each, is beyond me. It's reminiscent of that old vaudeville act, wherein one hapless but plucky fellow sets plates spinning quickly and balancing on top of long sticks, hovering nervously and flitting between them all trying to keep them up in the air. Looks great onstage, not so much in Government.

Requiring one Minister to engage in frenzied plate-spinning in itself is a poor approach, but perhaps the managerial woes run deeper than over-commitment. In preparation for this piece I spoke with Dr Shaman Stone, who is emphatic in her criticism of Garrett, suggesting he is inexperienced and ham-handed in his approach, and has been “emasculated” by his party in terms of holding any real power.

"In Senate Estimates it has been revealed that the Government's 'cultural diplomacy' policy had been slashed from $9.6 million to just $4.2million, a 52 per cent cut".

“One of his first acts was to abolish the overseas touring support. For someone who has performed overseas, it was extraordinary that this was one of the first programs to be slashed. The 'Australia on the World Stage' programme is gone, taking away government support for performers touring internationally".

There are cuts in other areas too. National collecting institutions such as the National Library of Australia are seeing cuts totalling $20 million through the 2 per cent efficiency dividend imposed by Labor. Chamber Music Australia has had their Masterclass and Special Performances program defunded. It goes on.

Something else that struck me was the criticism from Stone that Garrett has been given too much to handle, holding the enormous responsibility of the Environment portfolio, particularly as a relatively inexperienced Minister, as well as Arts and Heritage. (The double standards of this particular criticism is quite breathtaking).

We've heard talk of nurturing a Creative Australia, of encouraging emerging artists and featuring artist-in-residence programs in schools, but we're waiting to see plain action to back this up.

There are of course worthwhile arts programs made possible through Government support - just this week oversaw the launch of MOBFEST Tanami 2008, a remote Indigenous music education festival MOBFEST Tanami at Ti Tree School, NT, with funding provided through a Government initiative called the Community Festivals for Education Engagement. We've seen the creation of Screen Australia, a streamlined and strengthened funding body replacing the Australian Film Commission, Film Australia and the Film Finance Corporation. And tonight of course will see the winner of the newly-minted PM's Literary Award announced.

There are certainly examples of good work being done. But I want more. For starters, on both sides of Government I want a separate Federal and Shadow Minister for the Arts, and Arts alone. I want to see an attitude that it's not an indulgence to focus on our cultural life, to put time, energy and passion into nourishing Australian Arts as a major concern in and of itself. Not something to squeeze in between other more important matters.

Asked what are the achievements in Arts support Garrett is most proud of and what their overarching vision for Arts support would be while during this term, Garrett's office declined to comment.  Dare I suggest they were too busy?

As we head towards the end of the first year in power for the new Labor Government, it might be suitable to switch analogies.

What's that old wedding custom? You know, the one where everybody starts smashing plates?

Yeah, let's go with that one. Great.

Sonia Allan holds a B.A Communications (Theatre/Media) from Charles Sturt University, with training in performance, devised theatre, scriptwriting and cultural event practice, which explores ways in which theatre and creative events can directly benefit local communities. She worked throughout 2007 as an Event Manager for the Wakakirri National Storytelling Festival (a performing and visual arts festival for schools around Australia) and is a regular arts writer and reviewer for www.australianstage.com.au, Timeout Magazine and Artshub Australia. She is currently studying towards an MA (English) at the University of Sydney.

Comments

Interesting

Great article Sonia. Interestingly, Kim Carr, the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research has been shadowing the idea of including the Arts (along with humanities) in the NCRIS roadmap. So at least someone in government is thinking about it...

An artistic nation? I don't think so.

Unfortunately Sonia, this nation wasn't built on its artistic merits. It's all sport, sport sport. God help those of us with two left feet.

Arts... Where?

Sonia you've hit the nail sqaure on the head with this one.

I was asked to write an article for a boutique arts mag last week on, you know, arty stuff... So I think to myself, "lets see what Australia is doing in relation to the Arts." I head straight to Minister of the Arts website for some good juicy goss. Yeah... Pritty, priiiittty prrriitttty dissapointed. I found ONE media release hiding in amongst a myraid of green this, eco that...

What happened to the edgy activist? The guy who painted 'sorry' on his t-shirt for the closing ceremony of the Sydney Olympic Games? The aussie icon? The musician? The artist? What happened to you Pete? You're to busy towing the party line whislt our beds are still burning!

Onya Sonia, love your work!

peter who?

I guess we're just not an arts nation. You can't force people to like arts if they don't (I don't like footy that much, and I'd prefer not to be dragged along to games if I don't want to go, but I respect that others do and that there is a place for the funding of sport). But we could have better representation in government and more equitable financial support.

The impression I get anecdotally is that Garrett has been largely held back from speaking out, he's been told to tow the party line. He was such a dynamic agitator, I remember those sorry t-shirts too, now it's a bit of a limp celery approach ...

He may have been there, but I noticed on the abc footage of the literary awards, Garrett was nowhere in sight. He wasn't interviewed and wasn't present for the photo call with finalists and Rudd. Major literary prize and the arts minister isn't seen. Interesting.

And Bianca, thanks for the tip on the NCRIS arts inclusion. I hadn't heard about that and it sounds pretty interesting. Will definitely check it out.

CENSORED

In light of the recent Bill Henson fiasco, Australia's censorship laws came under tight scrutiny, the nation was up in arms!! Subsequently an Arts Censorship Forum was held down at the MCA with speakers such as Julian Burnside QC and Tamara Winikoff debating the issue. We fervently faught for our right to create art without first having to go through a tribunal. As artists in any medium, or media practitioners, we dont want to be censored!

I find it a tad amusing but really quite sad that the Federal Government is overtly censoring our Minister for the Arts...

Spread out like jam on bread

From what I gather having read this (my knowledge of the Australian government is extremely limited, as limited as my knowledge of how many types of cheese there are), the order of the portfolios (Environment, Heritage then Arts) is definitely an indication of what's important and what's not.

Come on, how can one person pay attention to so many portfolios at the same time. Have they not learnt about Ford's specialisation model? Division of labour (pun not intended), though not so much the repetitiveness of it.

How can they see what's behind their heads when they're looking the other way.

 

Hear, hear, Australia!

Sonia Allan wrote:

"For starters, on both sides of Government I want a separate Federal and Shadow Minister for the Arts, and Arts alone. I want to see an attitude that it's not an indulgence to focus on our cultural life, to put time, energy and passion into nourishing Australian Arts as a major concern in and of itself. Not something to squeeze in between other more important matters."

Well said Sonia! I support every word.

This excellent blog starts a debate which is long overdue.

Yes, but...

Definately agree that we should have a separate Arts Minister, and I must say I am disappointed at how little Garrett has done for the arts since the election. I thought, finally, we've got someone in government who might be a little bit like Keating, in that he has a passion for the arts, and sees the importance of funding it (although, lets not forget, Garrett was never an artist that needed funding from the government. I don't think Midnight Oil ever applied for an Arts Council grant).

My only hesitation is these continual statements that Australia is not an 'arts nation'. I'm sure I've said the same thing myself innumerable times, so I'm maybe in a more hopeful frame of mind today or something, but something about the statement seems wrong.

I guess my problem is that the statement seems quite deaftist. Its sort of like, well, if Australia's not an arts nation, then what are we all doing here arguing for more arts funding and a better Arts minister? Shouldn't we all just move to France or something? I think the truth is that Australians are are just as happy as any nation to hear stories about themselves (witness the huge successes of Australian plays such as 'Cloudstreet' or 'Holding the Man').

I think one of the problems is that because Australia is such a huge country, with its population spread so widely, and with lots of small towns scattered all over the place, its often hard for people to access the arts (and its difficult to get the arts to them). Plus, these little regional areas are often quite small, compared to say, the USA or UK, both of whom support many reputable regional arts companies. It may seem a simplistic explanation, but I wonder if we just haven't hit the right 'arts formula' to deliver arts to Australians yet. Problem is, one of the people who could be most influential in helping with that situation would be the Arts Minister.

And, as we've already agreed, he's a little busy with some out of control plates at the moment.

Here, here

I complelty agree Sonia. Separate the portfolios. Garrett was such a show pony before the election and now you don't really hear anything about him.

I had a conversation the other day about arts versus sports funding. I would usually fight for the arts side, but blame it on spring, I decided to take the sport side. So my argument went... 'I think sport is fantastic! Going and seeing live games is so thrilling. (Definitely winning argument at this point :) ) But I do think that sport is really such an important thing, especially as we see increasingly levels of obesity in Australia etc. By the end of the conversation, which I didn't win, I began to question why I was even comparing sport with the arts? How can we really compare them? They are both such valuable areas and money should be invested into both, but sport shouldn't lose funding to arts (controversial), arts should gain funding from elsewhere, but where? What do you think? Get rid of parking inspectors working on Sundays?

My brother had this thought on his blog, what do you guys think?

For the position of Treasurer we only accept an expert. A big part of the election campaign was about who had the knowledge and experience to manage our economy between Peter Costello and Wayne Swan.

No similar critique is applied to the other portfolios in government. We have ministers for defense with no defense experience, ministers for communications that know nothing about the telecommunications industry, ministers for health that know nothing about health.

Then they shuffle there positions around every few years based on how much power you have in some political party.

It’s ridiculous...

----

I suppose at least Garrett has had some enviro/arts experience.

Thanks again Sonia. Some really great ideas, I look forward to reading more.

I concur

Nice work Sonia, I think you have summed up my feelings about the non-exclusive arts portfolio quite well!

I am interested to see how arts/humanities would fit into the NCRIS roadmap - that seems to me to be be just pigeon-holing arts in with science, much the same as it is pigeon-holed with the environment now! Don't get me wrong, the arts needs to be on a research / funding roadmap, but not where it will be competing for dollars with portfolios that have traditionally won out over arts (though in the recent decade or so, science funding has dwindled - what happened to Australia being the 'smart country of the South-Pacific')... Arts is important to the growth of a nation, as is science - but is it appropriate to be putting them both in the same roadmap, competing for the same funding pool?

In this respect, I tend to have a similiar stance to the one Kells has on arts / sport - they are incomparably important to the nation, and need distinct funding roadmaps!

Hey, its great that the Hon. Kim Carr seems to be showing some interest in arts funding / development, but is that in our best interests? Maybe he can join forces with Garrett and compare notes on the future of the arts (After all, Kim Carr is the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research - let's innovate on Australia's handling of the arts).

I couldn't agree more. It's

I couldn't agree more.

It's great to see that aspiring artists in Australia finally have an eloquent voice to speak out for our interests.

More power to you.

Nice

Persuasive argument. I love the analogy of the spinning plates, so appropriate. I'm a big fan.