Syndicate content Subscribe to the RSS feed  › 
CLIMATE CHANGE

Walmart, Carbon, and Lessons for Woolworths

Leighton Jenkins's picture

In the USA Walmart have found a way to leverage their buying power to make a significant impact on their carbon footprint. Could Tesco in the UK and Woolworths in Australia implement the same model? 

The recent announcement by Walmart to reduce its carbon footprint has thrown down the challenge to other global retailers such as the UK’s Tesco and Australia’s Woolworths. Until this announcement all three essentially had drawn an imaginary wall around their business and set targets that were, a) related to their direct property and operations, b) therefore under their direct control. A diagram from the Tesco site shows this quite clearly.

The Walmart announcement goes much further whereby they announced that they would remove 20m metric tons of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Global Supply Chain by 2015. This is new and different as they will now work with their suppliers and look at  the entire lifecycle of a product, from sourcing of raw materials, manufacturing, transportation, customer use to end-of-life disposal.

 

Benefit of cap and trade ETS is it speaks the language of GDP

JEQP's picture

Although emission trading schemes and carbon credits don't seem to be the best way to fight global warming they work within the growth economics paradigm. They give a monetary value to something that was previously ignored, or at best counted as a saving, and therefore they add to the GDP.

Correcting the Australian Government - natural gas is NOT “clean energy”

Dr Gideon Polya's picture

On a weight basis, liquid natural gas is twice as dirty as brown coal, high school chemistry tells us.

Wave and Tidal Energy R&D Exciting

foggy's picture

Know your options. Have your say!

Climate change: a post-COP15 diagnosis

Prof Will Steffen's picture

The big news this week was the chaos over the negotiations on climate change in Copenhagen. Will Steffen was there, here's his assesment.

Not surprisingly, interpretations of the outcome from COP15 range from an outstanding success to an utter disaster, and everything in between.  Political leaders claim a big step forward towards climate protection, while the vast majority of the NGOs who flocked to Copenhagen blast the outcome as, at best, a wasted opportunity.

In many ways, views on the outcome of COP15 were strongly conditioned by expectations, especially for those who thought that the Copenhagen conference would ‘seal the deal’ for limiting anthropogenic climate change to a temperature rise of no more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Combating Climate Change Deniers: Simple Responses

Brad Grey's picture

Planet Ark and World Vision provide habdy responses to dish out to the sceptics.

Mitigation and Adaption in Agriculture: World Bank Summary Note

Andrew Jones's picture

Establishing and financing soil carbon programmes may rest heavily on the possibility to include them in emissions trading. 

Top Climate Scientists Opt for Carbon Taxes & Slam ETS

Dr Gideon Polya's picture

As policy makers prepare to meet in Copenhagen in December to discuss carbon emmissions trading schemes, many Australian and international climate science and economics experts would prefer to see a carbon tax on the table for discussion.

 

The Experiment that May Change the World

quagga's picture

Today a small group of scientists and a technician at Lawrenceville Plasma Physics plan to do a test run of a nuclear fusion device that *may* one day forever change the way we produce electrical power!

German Climate Politics: All that Glitters not Gold

Nina Drewes's picture

Germany may be a world leader in climate policy, but her politicians still have a lot of work to do.